Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    254

    Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    http://www.alaskahighwaynews.ca/regi...cess-1.2197906

    When hunters get mad, politicians jump.

    That fact was on display at a packed town hall meeting on backcountry access in Fort St. John Saturday.

    Nearly 300 hunters, anglers and other backcountry users came to hear from government officials and critics on land transfers to First Nations impacted by the Site C dam.

    While details on the confidential negotiations are few, there are fears the transfers could privatize access to the Upper Halfway Valley, the Peace-Moberly Tract and other popular recreation areas.

    While he could give few details on what lands were being considered, Peace River North MLA Pat Pimm said he would push for unimpeded access to Crown land adjacent to parcels deeded to First Nations.

    "One of the commitments that I've been given (by government) is access is not going to be denied," he said. "We're not going to be denying access anywhere around the province to the backcountry, to recreation country. That'd better be a condition that sticks as far as I'm concerned."

    Last week, Energy Minister Bill Bennett told the Alaska Highway News his government is looking at new ways of including local input on First Nations land transfers.

    However, he stressed that the Constitution insists negotiations between the Crown and aboriginal groups be "nation-to-nation"—meaning those negotiations aren't subject to public consultation.

    Critics also attended the meeting, including Kootenay West NDP MLA Katrine Conroy, who called government policy on wildlife allocations and land negotiations "divisive."



    Moose plan criticized



    Another hunting issue tied in with Site C is the B.C. government's plan to manage moose populations in Northeast B.C..

    Jesse Zeman of the BC Wildlife Federation criticized the plan at Saturday's meeting, saying government needs a strategy to recover moose populations in the northeast.

    He likened the current policy to dividing up pieces of a steadily shrinking pie.

    "You can change the way you divvy up the pieces, or you can try to make the pie bigger."

    In some cases, that has meant allocating a larger share of the moose hunt to aboriginal
    hunters.

    "We call it 'managing to zero.' You can call it a management plan, but really all we're doing is making sure hunting isn't the reason populations are in decline."

    Among the reasons for that decline is land clearing for resource development, which creates ideal hunting grounds for wolves and other predators. Zeman added that wildfire management has reduced the size of burns where moose and other ungulates thrive.

    He also said the government is underestimating the impact Site C will have on moose, deer and elk
    populations.

    The Joint Review Panel appointed to review the project agreed with BC Hydro that Site C was "not likely" to have "significant adverse effects" on those populations.

    However, Zeman said an independent study by the Wildlife Federation found otherwise.

    "If you talk about it in the context of all of B.C., there probably aren't significant adverse effects," he said.

    "But if you look into an area like the Peace River Valley—you create a large (dam) on some of the best habitat in B.C., you're going to have a significant impact on wildlife populations. There's no way around that."

    A 1975 study on the impact of the W.A.C. Bennett dam on moose found populations dropped from 12,500 to 4,000 due to habitat loss and drownings, Zeman said.

    Site C will cost around $8.8 billion and flood around 83 kilometres of the Peace River Valley, including traditional territory belonging to First Nations.

    reporter@dcdn.ca


    © Copyright 2016 Alaska Highway News
    Make sure to Like and Share us on Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/BCWildlifeFederation

    Twitter- @BCWildlife


  2. Site Sponsor

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,594

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    Quote "A 1975 study on the impact of the W.A.C. Bennett dam on moose found populations dropped from 12,500 to 4,000 due to habitat loss and drownings, Zeman said."


    I can understand the habitat loss, but drownings? If someone has more info on this, I'd like to read it. In 40 years of hunting, I've only noticed how great a swimmer a moose is and how far they can swim.
    If you can pack it in, You can pack it out !!!

    UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL !!!


    BCWF
    WSSBC
    CCFR
    " The secret of change is to focus all your energy, not on fighting the old, but building on the new"
    Socrates.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    43

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    I can't find the original report (Bonar, 1975) but this report references it:

    https://www.bchydro.com/pwcp/pdfs/re...ort_no_001.pdf

    Although moose are great swimmers, there is a difference between swimming across a crystal clear lake/river with no obstructions, and swimming across a freshly flooded reservoir that is full of floating trees and other junk. Every living creature has a limited amount of energy.

    Although not a scientific report, "Under These Waters" gives the account from someone who worked on the reservoir.http://www.bcfs100.ca/docs/pdf/0/380.pdf
    Page 97
    A pilot of some acclaim who flew the area frequently reported that many moose were trapped amongst the floating debris as the waters rose. Apparently there were enough dead carcasses floating to disgust the hardest of hunters. The local residents confirmed the tremendous loss of wildlife!

    I'll try and find a picture of when they initially flooded the dam, and had all of the logs laying on the water.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Van Isl
    Posts
    2,444

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter Dog View Post
    However, he stressed that the Constitution insists negotiations between the Crown and aboriginal groups be "nation-to-nation"—meaning those negotiations aren't subject to public consultation.

    This is a pretty loose interpretation of the Constitution. In other words the Gov. is going to do whatever suits them and to hell with the rest of us and the wildlife. Nation to nation...what a crock. Who keeps voting these idiots in?
    Its not an election , its a selection, Trudeau is a prime example. He is not qualified, the only reason he is in, is because of his dad and the media. Yes they are elected, But the media manipulates the public to swing the votes , Hence the " Selection " comment.

    Anyway , not trying to highjack this thread into another Trudeau bashing ... This is a crock of shit
    JOIN US AT CRSPORTFISHING.CA

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    P.G. 7-15
    Posts
    2,007

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    Quote Originally Posted by Ride Red View Post
    Quote "A 1975 study on the impact of the W.A.C. Bennett dam on moose found populations dropped from 12,500 to 4,000 due to habitat loss and drownings, Zeman said."


    I can understand the habitat loss, but drownings? If someone has more info on this, I'd like to read it. In 40 years of hunting, I've only noticed how great a swimmer a moose is and how far they can swim.
    When they blocked the water on W.A.C. dam, it came up fast. Floating logs and ground derbie made in impossible for moose to swim. There's lots of stories of people bearly getting out alive. Today there is miles of shoreline that are so steep and sheer rock from the high water line down, if any animal fell in theirs no way for them to get out.
    No one on their death bed ever said; I should have spent more time at work.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,594

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    Quote Originally Posted by kbellamy View Post
    I can't find the original report (Bonar, 1975) but this report references it:

    https://www.bchydro.com/pwcp/pdfs/re...ort_no_001.pdf

    Although moose are great swimmers, there is a difference between swimming across a crystal clear lake/river with no obstructions, and swimming across a freshly flooded reservoir that is full of floating trees and other junk. Every living creature has a limited amount of energy.

    Although not a scientific report, "Under These Waters" gives the account from someone who worked on the reservoir.http://www.bcfs100.ca/docs/pdf/0/380.pdf
    Page 97
    A pilot of some acclaim who flew the area frequently reported that many moose were trapped amongst the floating debris as the waters rose. Apparently there were enough dead carcasses floating to disgust the hardest of hunters. The local residents confirmed the tremendous loss of wildlife!

    I'll try and find a picture of when they initially flooded the dam, and had all of the logs laying on the water.
    Quote Originally Posted by MRP View Post
    When they blocked the water on W.A.C. dam, it came up fast. Floating logs and ground derbie made in impossible for moose to swim. There's lots of stories of people bearly getting out alive. Today there is miles of shoreline that are so steep and sheer rock from the high water line down, if any animal fell in theirs no way for them to get out.
    Good info, thanks guys. Ride Red.
    If you can pack it in, You can pack it out !!!

    UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL !!!


    BCWF
    WSSBC
    CCFR
    " The secret of change is to focus all your energy, not on fighting the old, but building on the new"
    Socrates.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toon town
    Posts
    13,138

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    https://www.bchydro.com/pwcp/pdfs/re...ort_no_001.pdf

    It has been estimated that loss of critical winter habitat, drownings, and more subtle (less direct) effects of the hydro development resulted in a moose population reduction, in the entire WillistonBasin, of from about 12,500 animals pre-flooding to less than 4000 afterward (Bonar 1975). A further, relatively quick reduction to "around 2000" over-wintering animals has been hypothesized, due primarily to the effects of expanding local forestry operations--possibly compounded by the effects of flooding on timber supply. As suggested by MOE (1982), "With the high committment of remaining timber, there are little or no opportunities for integrated forest management to protect the remaining moose population."






















    Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.

    Mandela

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,494

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    That's pretty tough to read.

    Quote Originally Posted by GoatGuy View Post
    "With the high committment of remaining timber, there are little or no opportunities for integrated forest management to protect the remaining moose population."






















    The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Lowermainland
    Posts
    6,481

    Re: Hunters and anglers pack meeting on Site C, Crown land access

    It's a sad topic indeed when you talk about the loss of moose / wildlife and wildlife habitat !
    Arctic Lake

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •