Sirloin
06-15-2017, 09:28 AM
What do you guys think? Is this info being presented honestly or is it being presented for a hit piece on hunters?
http://globalnews.ca/news/3529525/female-elk-in-parts-of-alberta-b-c-have-learned-to-become-almost-invulnerable-to-hunters-study/
(http://globalnews.ca/news/3529525/female-elk-in-parts-of-alberta-b-c-have-learned-to-become-almost-invulnerable-to-hunters-study/)
Here's some of the stuff this same "online journalist" who put out this elk article chooses to take a interest in
https://twitter.com/MercyForAnimals/status/874867750505721856 (http://twitter.com/MercyForAnimals/status/874867750505721856)
https://twitter.com/GlobalBC/status/874816564796772352
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/860388759774392320
(https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/860388759774392320)
https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/847295527238500357 (https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/847295527238500357)
https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/829547884890578946
(https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/829547884890578946)
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/808554546515611648 (https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/808554546515611648)
https://twitter.com/CaleyRamsay/status/808462634085478400
https://twitter.com/georgejoseph94/status/804074915330723840 (https://twitter.com/georgejoseph94/status/804074915330723840)
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/801516316813361154 (https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/801516316813361154)
https://twitter.com/amnestyusa/status/800541419316400128
https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/794764946810736640 (https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/794764946810736640)
Twitter bio : dog daddy and online jounalist
6 posts about the same story of a few dogs being stolen. Appears to have a big soft spot for animals and appears to take an interest in animal activism, left wing activism and calling into question the ethics of eating meat.
So, am I just finding bias because I'm looking for it? Or are research papers like these being used as front page news worthy stories just to take a jab at hunters?
http://globalnews.ca/news/3529525/female-elk-in-parts-of-alberta-b-c-have-learned-to-become-almost-invulnerable-to-hunters-study/
(http://globalnews.ca/news/3529525/female-elk-in-parts-of-alberta-b-c-have-learned-to-become-almost-invulnerable-to-hunters-study/)
Here's some of the stuff this same "online journalist" who put out this elk article chooses to take a interest in
https://twitter.com/MercyForAnimals/status/874867750505721856 (http://twitter.com/MercyForAnimals/status/874867750505721856)
https://twitter.com/GlobalBC/status/874816564796772352
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/860388759774392320
(https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/860388759774392320)
https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/847295527238500357 (https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/847295527238500357)
https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/829547884890578946
(https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/829547884890578946)
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/808554546515611648 (https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/808554546515611648)
https://twitter.com/CaleyRamsay/status/808462634085478400
https://twitter.com/georgejoseph94/status/804074915330723840 (https://twitter.com/georgejoseph94/status/804074915330723840)
https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/801516316813361154 (https://twitter.com/heidenreichphil/status/801516316813361154)
https://twitter.com/amnestyusa/status/800541419316400128
https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/794764946810736640 (https://twitter.com/GlobalEdmonton/status/794764946810736640)
Twitter bio : dog daddy and online jounalist
6 posts about the same story of a few dogs being stolen. Appears to have a big soft spot for animals and appears to take an interest in animal activism, left wing activism and calling into question the ethics of eating meat.
So, am I just finding bias because I'm looking for it? Or are research papers like these being used as front page news worthy stories just to take a jab at hunters?