Page 11 of 46 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 459

Thread: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    739

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Is there any use in phoning the dease lk rcmp or the crown (wherever they are) to nicely voice our disgust?

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Changing diapers
    Posts
    1,099

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Once again begs the question, what if the illegal blockade was by resident hunters instead of FN? Swat team,helicopters, tactical response, national incident, terrrorism?
    Way to stand up for yourself and your rights, will donate what I can, what about the BCWF??

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Okanagan
    Posts
    924

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Quote Originally Posted by The Hermit View Post
    So Goat Guy can the BCWF step up and help with Mick's legal costs? If not why not? Thanks

    Crickets......

    x3 - Where does the BCWF stand on this?

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,494

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Not officially speaking for the BCWF I'll say this. Mr. McKee acted on his own, and I doubt the Fed would want to encourage future instances of possible illegal activities and participation in highly volatile events by financially supporting Mr. McKee. Summed up, it's a journey filled with trap doors and controversy. In addition, the Fed already spent $50,000 on the injunction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lionhill View Post
    Crickets......

    x3 - Where does the BCWF stand on this?
    The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    langley
    Posts
    1,001

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    A little donation coming your way....answer is hellyeah

    Being retired with time to come and go as I please (with the wife's permission) I appreciate what you're doing for ALL of us.
    Finland is a neutral country - but the guns point to the east.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    14,213

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Quote Originally Posted by Whonnock Boy View Post
    Not officially speaking for the BCWF I'll say this. Mr. McKee acted on his own, and I doubt the Fed would want to encourage future instances of possible illegal activities and participation in highly volatile events by financially supporting Mr. McKee. Summed up, it's a journey filled with trap doors and controversy. In addition, the Fed already spent $50,000 on the injunction.
    This would be where I want my BCWF funds spent, the BCWF could actually get more members by backing Mick. I will give the BCWF a couple more days to come to the table, if they don't I will be donating my BCWF membership fees for the year to Mick. I will urge others to do the same.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    109

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    Thanks Nute, I think I tried to figure out the password to your clue "good cause?" ans I was not able to so it got cancelled. ooops!

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    109

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    To Spy: I appreciate everything the BCWF has done. It was their good work that got the injunction in place. Like I said they did entertain funding my defense but it is not it their mandate. So Please...continue with your memberships to BCWF and don't send your BCWF membership dues to me. They did great work and should be commended for their timely action!!!

    Mick McKee
    hd09hogrider@gmail.com
    Last edited by hogzotic; 02-27-2017 at 12:36 PM.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    108 ranch
    Posts
    964

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    If the BCWF can't or won't stand behind Mr.McKee then what does it stand for?..A retired member of the RCMP that knows the laws and is pursuing his sport of hunting legally is being blocked from pursuing it...This alone is against the law ...The case seems to me to really be about .....The native blockade being legal.... and the pursuit of your govt given right to hunt and pursue game legally.... being illegal...This case seems to me should go all the way to the Supreme Court Of Canada ...If the RCMP were at the blockade and turned back Mr.McKee then he tresspassed through the blockade then he might be guilty..but he just removed some of the obstruction on the road and started to drive through..The FN that tried to stop him by standing in front of him did so of his own accord..The FN then let him proceed on ..Where was the criminal act?..Removing or driving around a blockade is not a criminal act...Unions have blockades all the time during labor disputes ..Company officials and other employees drive through and are not charged..Where is the Native Precident that crossing their blockade a criminal act..Show me that in law ...Seems that if Mr.McKee is fopund guilty a whole new can of worms gets opened for the Supreme Court of Canada ..Many cases will be challenged over this guilty verdict ..Should be someone willing to work ..Pro Bono ..for this case ..Just my rant and belief ...Dennis

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    region 9
    Posts
    11,595

    Re: Klappan Blockade -Defense fund for Criminal Charges Against Hunter

    ^^^^I agree with you Dennis, so mind my ignorance, but are we attempting to submit this case to the Supreme Court of Canada???

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •