Originally Posted by
KodiakHntr
You can see how your statement would be confusing, given the context of the conversation.
I mean, we have members here alluding to the possibility that the hunt in question was purchased for the event. In my opinion that makes it WORSE.
I mean, here we have the WSS not only providing advertising, but financially supporting a convicted poacher.
To me that says that the WSS condones his actions. Or at the very least, the members that suggested it as prize condone it.
Its not like Martin hasn't been discussed a bunch on cgn, 24, outdoorsmen, AND here. 0.1 seconds with the google'r will bring the discussions up.....