I got a 4-12 leupy...
4-9 great for hunting 9-12 I use for target shooting.
I got a 4-12 leupy...
4-9 great for hunting 9-12 I use for target shooting.
Thompson Center ProHunter - Owner/Operator
Level A Welder / Fabricator by Trade
I have a 4.5-14 leupold as well and love it. I used to use a 3-9 and It was good as well. But for myself I prefer the higher powerd scopes. I do not go to the range much so its not a target gun that it is on. I just find that with a good rest the bigger the animal is in the scope the easier it is to pick the spot you want to hit. That being said, One of the buffalo I shot I was using a rifle with a 6-16 and I had put the scope to 16 power to judge the animal. He was only about 150 yrds away at the time. when he turned and gave me a broadside shot and I pulled the trigger. It was a perfect shot [double lung], however he took off like a jack rabbit. After I jacked in another shell, I had a hell of a time trying to relocate him in the scope at 16 power. He had ran about 100 yrds to the trees before I was able to get the cross hairs on him, he was going up hill and I was able to center on his spine and down he went.It was a good lesson to learn.Use binos to judge, and at close range don't use the high power.
bhh
Anything more then a 3-9 on a Big Game hunting rifle is a waste....the field of view one gives up isn't worth the extra 3x... IMO.
Stick with a 3-9x40.....it's all you need.
Unless you shoot elk at 900 yards......then niether will do![]()
I don't see that you loose that much field of view. you can still have a fairly low power, mine being 4.5. So how much difference in the field of view is it between 3 power and 4.5? I am interested to know.IMO you only gain by having the higher power alternative.
bhh
Last edited by Bighorn hunter; 02-18-2008 at 04:43 PM.
I just bought a Zeiss over the Leupold VX3 because I held them both at the same time and prefered the Zeiss.
The difference between FOV between scopes of same brand/different magnification and brand names is pretty wild.
Just for the Hell of it I looked a few up for you.
Leupold Rifleman 3 - 9 x 40
3x FOV 32.9 feet(100yrds)
9x FOV 11.0 feet(100 yards)
Leupold VX3 3.5 - 10 x 40
3.5x FOV 29.5 feet(100yrds)
10x FOV 9.8 feet(100 yrds)
Leupold VX3 3.5 - 10 x 50
same as x40
Leupold VX3 4.5 - 14 x 40
4.5x FOV 19.9 feet(100yds)
14x FOV 6.6 feet(100 yards)
Zeiss Conquest 3.5 - 10 X 44
3.5x FOV 35.1 feet(100 yrds)
10x FOV 11.61 feet(100 yrds)
Last edited by DrewT; 04-08-2008 at 11:39 PM.
Hopefully that 4th little point on that mule deer wasn't a twig/branch by some guys head and he's all camoed up....I think using your scope is a very unsafe and irresponsible way of looking at/for game. Look at it from the other perspective..................binoculars don't have a barrel with a bullet looking at whatever you are.
"Know your Land, Know Your Prey" - Mantracker
"I still don’t know why I fish or why other men fish, except that we like it and it makes us think and feel."– Roderick Haig-Brown
www.nrgcbc.ca
I think you've got it all wrong partner. I knew that mulie was there. I wasn't "looking for deer" with my scope. I don't agree with doing that at all. I had been watching that deer for a while through my binos at about 250 yards, but couldn't find the 4th little point that I needed for it to be legal. So, cranked the scope up to 12x and there it was, clear as day.
And if you think I'm looking at this deer with a bullet in the chamber and my finger on the trigger than your wrong. I don't see the harm in doing this whatsoever. I really disagree with your comment.