1) he makes the case that the only difference between today and 30 years ago is the number of hunters
2) he believes going back to regulations of 30 years ago would meet current objectives
3) he proposes regulations of 30 years ago would be sustainable
The only accurate statement is the number of hunters. The demographics of the hunter is changing, wildlife management objectives are changing, the influence of First Nations is changing, and the approaches are different in today's world, our habitat, access, hunting styles game calls optics and weapons are much more in favour of the hunter, predator populations influence are all different and I don't see where he is considering any of it.
Look at the elk seasons in region 4 vs those in region 8.