Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 109

Thread: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4

    Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Hello, I am brand new to hunting and I have so many questions. Most answers I am quickly finding by doing research and reviewing other threads, but I cant seem to find a straight answer for this: Camo or not? I am looking to get into big game hunting in BC regions 2 and 3. I understand that it obviously helps, but is it essential?
    If yes, what brands/types of gear would experienced hunters recommend and why? And do the different camo patterns make a difference?
    And if no, what alternatives do you suggest?

    Thanks for the help!

  2. Site Sponsor

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Sorry I forgot the joke!!

    Two hunters were dragging their dead deer back to their car. Another hunter approached pulling his along too.

    "Hey, I don't want to tell you how to do something ... but I can tell you that it's much easier if you drag the deer in the other direction. Then the antlers won't dig into the ground."

    After the third hunter left, the two decided to try it.

    A little while later one hunter said to the other, "You know, that guy was right. This is a lot easier!"

    "Yeah, but we're getting farther from the truck," the other added.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,426

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    no not essential, I've killed lots of stuff wearing red and orange clothes.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lower Mainland, B.C.
    Posts
    197

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Big game animals (deer, moose, elk, etc.) are colour blind, so there is really no need for camo, just wear bright orange so you won't get shot. Straight Shootin.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tent city Victoria
    Posts
    3,562

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    My uncle has pictures of himself with some nice Mulies and sheep and he's wearing jeans and a red flannel shirt. I'm sure camo doesn't hurt but I don't think it's essential.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    83

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    No.

    The only ones which might need camouflage are predators and birds.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    13,183

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Camo is nice if you like Duck Dynasty
    1. Human over population
    2. Government burden and overreach

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Region 2
    Posts
    1,339

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Do you need camo, simply no. The only reason I, and alot of other hunters I know, is because it is the specifically designed for hunting. Has numerous pockets, is quiet, and waterproof. If it is a nice day and I am just out for a walk I will wear jeans and a t-shirt.
    I don't shoot innocent animals... Just the ones that look guilty!

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Campbell River
    Posts
    3,925

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    Camo or no Camo... if you move while they are looking at you or you get upwind you will be busted.
    A Pine needle falls. An Eagle sees it. A Deer hears it. A Bear smells it

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    1,206

    Re: Camouflage Vs. No camouflage?

    I'd say all our grandfather's did alright before 3d camouflage technology was introduced.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •