Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Regional Bag limits - Deer

Threaded View

  1. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Kamloops, BC
    Posts
    1,797

    Re: Regional Bag limits - Deer

    Well the confusion for me was they just said deer 3, so was that 3 of each or just three, they could definitely word it better, never really spelled it out anywhere. hence why when it said see note in deer licenses section that made sense to me cause they are completely different species as far as im concerned so why group them together at only 3. To me that's like putting moose and elk together and saying provincial bag limit of 1. Definitely could be worded better. I know lawyers that have troubles interpretting different building and electrical codes as well as the regs so how does the average citizen stand a chance half the time. I have heard many people complain that they word it to try and trick them into breaking the law, I'm not so sure about that, I don't find it that bad over all, but I can see where they are coming from. Especially when they are trying to increase the number of white tail taken one would think they would separate them and reduce the mulie provincial bag limit so everyone doesnt get 3 mulies and no whities. I don't know... I think they could definitely update things and make things a little easier for the average person. Also, to Bearstump, there is no need for bashing me like that, i have never broken the law, it has always been a non-issue for me as i said. I take 1 deer and maybe 1 bear a year and as a single i can't eat any more than that so it's basically all i ever take. I'm not a poacher or a waster. As for the other guy bearstump was talking about, no comment.
    Last edited by russm86; 09-16-2011 at 09:02 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •