Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Ethics question?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Westminster, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    674

    Ethics question?

    Right to the point

    Is it okay to shoot ducks that are swimming? I am thinking if you jump them they are in the water right? Is there any rules. I guess this is two parts. Is it legal. Is it ethical.

    Thanks
    James

  2. Site Sponsor

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Maple Bay
    Posts
    319

    Re: Ethics question?

    I believe the technical term is water swattin'.
    It is perfectly legal. I would do it but it is easier to kill a flying bird.

    Didn't we just have a thread about this?
    Hooked on quack.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Where the Bears are.
    Posts
    2,119

    Re: Ethics question?

    Where I come from it's considered poor sportsmanship and it's called "sluicing". Just like shooting upland game birds on the ground is called "ground sluicing". Is it unethical? Hell, who can say. We all have personal choices to make. To sit in judgement on someone who is legally taking game by whatever means because it doesn't "fit" or some how conflicts with our own ideas of what is fair isn't for me or anyone else on this board to say.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Pacific Flyway
    Posts
    1,822

    Re: Ethics question?

    Nothing illegal about it. Ethics on the other hand, well like the saying "different strokes for different folks" it only matters on the person doing the shooting whether they feel its sporting. Same goes for shooting a goose on the ground.

    I feel that however a guy wants to shoot a bird, aslong as he's trying his best to make a quick clean kill is fine with me. Some cant hit birds wingshooting shots out to 40+ yards which they figure is their "range", sure you could can call shooting on the wing being sporting but I wouldnt call wounding and birds later dieing a day later from wounds very sporting at all. Make a clean kill thats all that counts.

    Besides, geese on the ground is just like turkey hunting, and we dont have any turkeys here
    1st Im in charge, and if not Matt is. Your job is to sign checks, tell us we're doing good and open your case of scotch after a good day. 2nd my fee. You can keep it, all I want in exchange for my service is the right to hunt all the drakes. A male. Buck only. Why and how are my business. If you don't like it, go alone. Set up right here or in a swamp or in the middle of a noshoot field for all I care. I've been on too many duck hunts with rich dentists to listen to any more suicidal ideas. Ok?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ladner, B.C.
    Posts
    497

    Re: Ethics question?

    Any birds that land in my decoys get a free pass unless they leave and come back.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Maple Ridge, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    1,026

    Re: Ethics question?

    It's legal but not considered sporting. Almost everyone has done it and you'll know when you want more sporting shooting. Ethical, like CF said, trying for a clean kill is one of the most ethical aspects of hunting.
    I think it's easier to kill a bird in the air too though. When they jump up, they offer a pretty good shot most times.
    Dan
    Buddi doing what she does best!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pemberton BC
    Posts
    1,601

    Re: Ethics question?

    Here is my take on it- It depends who you are, and what you are interested in.

    Some guys view grouse as thier #1 challenge. They carry sxs shotguns, have grouse dogs and wander the uplands. Ground sluicing a grouse woudl be unthinkable. But, when they sometimes deer hunt, a little buck standing on the side of the road is a good "meat buck" and they are happy to take it.

    Some guys view deer as thier #1 challenge. They carry rifles, hunt tough terrain, and study deer habits. Shooting a little deer on the road would be unthinkable. But on thier way to deer camp, they often have a .22 or 20 guage in the truck, to nail grouse on the road, for the pot, and they are happy with that.

    Some guys are dedicated waterfowlers. They have dogs, decoys and boats. Shooting waterfowl on the ground or sitting in water is unthinkable. But they might shoot a deer on the road, or a grouse with a .22.

    I'm not a waterfowler, but if I went out with someone that was, used his decoys etc, I would play by his rules, and only wing shoot. However, if I was faced with a situation where I happened upon some ducks in a pond or field, and I coudl get within range, I would most likely treat them like roadside grouse, and ground sluice them with my 20 guage SXS...:lol

    If, at on point, I became keenly interested in waterfowling, most likely I too would become a wing shooter only, since really, what's the point of becoming a "keen" ground sluicer?
    Knowledgeable shooters agree- The 375 Ruger is the NEW KING of all 375 caliber cartridges. ALL HAIL THE NEW KING!

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Maple Ridge, BC
    Posts
    1,133

    Re: Ethics question?

    To be a little tangental...

    In the south, the epitome of calling is to land the ducks on the water, they even have a term for it, can't remember right now. Then they scare them up to shoot, which in my estimation is the easiest deadliest shot on ducks, straight up from the water that is...

    Get some ducks under your belt, then worry about how.

    Ian

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    South Vancouver Island
    Posts
    53

    Re: Ethics question?

    I wouldn't have a problem hunting with a water-swatter or a ground-pounder. Its the skybusters that piss me off!!!!!

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,001

    Re: Ethics question?

    Well it's been said. Legal, but in most circles frowned on.

    Upland for me is slowly becoming the only hunting I want to do. In slow years like this one, I will take em where I can get em. Running flying or sitting! In good years like 2006, I will try to kick them up (scare them into flushing) so they have a sporting chance.

    Waterfowl, I prefer to wingshoot and get the cleanest kills that way. Every duck I shot this fall except one had at least one hole in the head and died instantly. I did sluice one, but that was only because I didn't want to buy McDonalds and he didn't want to flush

    I would suspect every waterfowler out there was done it at least a few times, and those that say they haven't are probably too embarassed to admit it.

    All that said, the end result is still meat on the table.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •