Re: Who’s feeding raw food?
Won't sugar coat this opinion Cliff - if you truly want to optimize Carlos' long-term health and minimize or even eliminate vet visits and want him to age gracefully, avoid highly processed kibble that is cooked at high temperature (which kills important enzymes and nutrients) and only feed him raw food and bones.
Sure it's a bit more expensive than the cheaper kibble brands and it's a bit more work to prepare, but if you really care about his well being then the extra cost and work should be worth it. Besides, you will absolutely save on vet bills in the long run and he will most certainly live longer and age more gracefully. Also virtually all kibble is made with a ton of preservatives so that the bags can last on store shelves for many months or years before spoiling - do you want Carlos to eat that shit?
Because kibble is cooked and bone dry, it's extremely dehydrating for dogs to eat - that's why they almost always gulp a ton of water after wolfing down a bowl of kibble. It's not a healthy way for dogs to nourish themselves this way and it's hard on their organs like the kidneys. Whereas raw food already has an appropriate amount of hydrating components naturally embedded in it (water/gelatin etc)
Put it this way, when you look at the human population at large, generally speaking, do the folks who eat more natural diets and prepare their foods from scratch and avoid highly processed foods live longer and age more gracefully than folks who tend to eat a lot of fast food and mostly only eat highly processed foods with tons of preservatives/chemicals/synthetics/fillers/sugars/toxins etc that come in a frozen box and are "cooked" in a microwave?
I rest my case
"It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority." - Benjamin Franklin
"A true patriot will defend his country from its Government." - Thomas Jefferson