Re: Area Restrictions Questioning the Rationale
Originally Posted by
skibum
This is not due to a past fire - the reason given is to limit the risk of a fire.
It should be clear that government has a tendency to not be that transparent, and we let them get away with it. I could just be in a tin-foil hat mood, but you let them use and emotion reason, not one based in science, well you should know how that goes....
I did email the "contact" on the page - of course, it my question is just being bumped around.
You’re right to question anything and everything the government imposes. The government not only doesn’t care what’s best for the people of this province/country, they actively seek to gain further controls through “safety”, “tolerance”, “inclusion”, and other BS reasons. Their goal isn’t to make anything better for you and me….it’s to make things better for themselves, and control is what does that for them.
F them…..anything the gubment says is simply an advisement that they’ll take something from you if you’re caught doing something they say not to. Choose for yourself which of their advisements you agree with and follow them…..the rest, calculate the risk/reward and make your own decision on that too. Only thing worse than a politician is a whole bunch of politicians.
PAPERS! Show me YOUR PAPERS!!
I don't think crotch is the stealthiest scent for deer hunting. (Surrey Boy)
so are you gonna stop spreading it on your nuts for your dog to lick off? (monasheemountainman)
You weren't there and you didn't get a moose hoof to the balls. (300rum700)