Resource Road Density in BC – A Discussion Paper on Issues and Solutions

[Bugle M In]

Here's another topic for reading/thoughts and discussions if anyone is interested:

http://huntersforbc.ca/resource-road...8Ttbq47H40N1BE

[j270wsm]

One area I cut fire wood has recently had a few km of roads removed. It’s a good start but there is a long ways to go.

[Liptugger]

How do they remove a road, just tear it up so it is unusable for people? Why not just let nature take it back?

[Livewire322]

How do they remove a road, just tear it up so it is unusable for people? Why not just let nature take it back?

One possible reason:Because people are likely to continuously clear an otherwise drivable road if they want to access something beyond. In most cases it’s much more difficult for a regular joe to re-build a road that has been dug up than it is to clear it of ‘nature taking it back’

In case it isn’t obvious, I’m all for digging up (not just water bars, but big trenches) spur roads that aren’t in use by industry - be it the first couple hundred meters or farther.

[emerson]

Road “removal” doesn’t stop easy predator travel for a long time. It does keep a lot of people out though.

[skibum]

Road “removal” doesn’t stop easy predator travel for a long time. It does keep a lot of people out though.

I have seen a couple (spur roads) that have been made more difficult for predators - the length of the road was dug up, not just every 50 metres (mounds to pot holes). I had difficulty following it on foot. But don't think too many will be deactivated this way.... $$$$

[Bugle M In]

And if you read, there is an acknowledgement that no one wants all the roads removed, as after all, it is what we use to get into a
watershed.
What is needed is all the spur roads to be ripped up for a good couple of 100 meters.

And yes, point noted on the fact that wolves will still take advantage of it.
That is a harder one to tackle.

But that's why the thread was posted, as to have discussions on thoughts and ideas.
We certainly have to start somewhere and have policies changed.
This is how it starts, and we need to get our acts together real quick.
Many issues to tackle in BC before it really is too late, imo.

[MichelD]

I was up in Region 3 in September and went looking for a road where we had accessed a real honey hole for deer a few years ago and the road had been completely removed and thoroughly dug up.

[tipper]

I was up in Region 3 in September and went looking for a road where we had accessed a real honey hole for deer a few years ago and the road had been completely removed and thoroughly dug up.

Great to here. I wish more would be deactivated!

[Sitkaspruce]

This nothing new, has been discussed for 20+ years and we still have the same issues. The discussion only focus on timber extraction, there is lots more industry that builds road.

- Mining, O&G and FLNRORD don't talk to each other about roads. Lots of examples where we have two roads paralleling each other to two different resources being extracted in the same valley
- Forest and mining companies get breaks on stumpage and royalties to build roads, but to deactivate them is on their own. O&G have to do both on their own. Who wants to cut into profits when they don't have to?
- The process to deactivate now includes lots of stakeholders and not all of them want the road gone, so it gets tied up in bureaucratic red tape. Wait until the FN get to say what happens!
- Its funny how many recreationalists don't want to see "their" road or roads deactivated - lake, river/stream, campsite, hunting blocks etc. would be taken away.
And remember, the less access there is the smaller area that more people will be recreating in - hunting, fishing, camping etc.

Roads are not going any where and every year, the demand for more fiber, more O&G and more coal and/or minerals increases and to fulfill that, there will be more roads built.

Cheers

SS