Another question. Why settle for what is better? What about what is best? I know that cons are better then libs and libs are better then dips when it comes to gun control but is any of them really that good? Sure the cons let me own a ar 15 but why couldn't I own a 30 rounder for it? Sure the cons took away the gun registration but I'm still registered as a gun owner. Why can't I have a baby browning or shoot my ar on private property? Both libs and cons have made advancements on gun control that has done little to protect the gun owner or enable him/her to own whatever gun they want. Gun control measures have changed lots over the life span of canada. I'm sure some old timers remember prior to the FAC days. I remember the FAC days when I went to the cop shop and got one and could go anywhere and buy a gun then i bitched whined moaned and dripped when the PAL/POL came out and I had to take a course to legally own the guns I'd had for 20 years. Now we got the new generation of gun owners that think the PAL is a normal way of doing things with little regard to how things have changed over the decades of gun control. The government of the day took all these privileges inch by inch and we let them. It didn't matter what party was holding the throne they still took it.