Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Spotting Scopes

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Squamish
    Posts
    206

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    I'm very happy with my STX and BTX Swarovski's, it is probably the most versatile system with the best glass in the world. But I would take a Kowa over the STS lineup from Swaro. The Kowa 88 series is incredible. But I decided to pony up the cash for an optics system that would fit me for the next 20 years. It took a number of years and alot of disappointment in lesser scopes, but very happy I finally took the plunge.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern BC
    Posts
    3,094

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    I have never met anyone who has ponied up the money for top tier glass, who has said that they could downgrade to recover some money with a lesser product and be just as happy.



    Sure see that with all other gear though. There are always ads out there for top shelf gear that has "can't justify the price of it to sit in the garage and get used once", but you never see "selling my Swarovski, down sizing to a Nikon".


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    765

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    now is a great time for buying used high end optics. I had bought a swarovski for a muskwa trip a few yrs back. Awesome scope. I sold it to buy a new rifle. A few weeks ago I bought a lightly used Zeiss dialyt 18-45x65 for basically half price. Its going to be handy for me to positively identify immature moose at 250-300 yds. I have zeiss 7x42 dialyts for the past 30 yrs but had to pass on a few animals as I wasnt sure. Last summer I bought Leica ultravid 10x42 hd thinking That would be the answer and had to pass on a small bull lasdt fall hence anothe spotting scope lol. If I could get any bull draw I could save some money.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    963

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Quote Originally Posted by KodiakHntr View Post
    I have never met anyone who has ponied up the money for top tier glass, who has said that they could downgrade to recover some money with a lesser product and be just as happy.



    Sure see that with all other gear though. There are always ads out there for top shelf gear that has "can't justify the price of it to sit in the garage and get used once", but you never see "selling my Swarovski, down sizing to a Nikon".

    Every time your read a reply come back and read this post. Theres no short cut to good glass.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    151

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Thanks for all the feedback everyone!! I will read through it and hopefully have a chance and look through some Scopes once this whole Covid thing is over and see what I like..

    Vince

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,542

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Cheap optics suck, and I hate them all. Cheap spotters suck the hardest, and I hate them the most.

    Mine is a Swarovski ATS 65mm with 20-60 eyepiece I found for a song ($1,500), when retail was like $2,500 -$3,000). I’d have happily bought Zeiss or Leica at that price too.
    Twist and pull.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    599

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Quote Originally Posted by Krico View Post
    Cheap optics suck, and I hate them all. Cheap spotters suck the hardest, and I hate them the most.

    Mine is a Swarovski ATS 65mm with 20-60 eyepiece I found for a song ($1,500), when retail was like $2,500 -$3,000). I’d have happily bought Zeiss or Leica at that price too.
    Couldn't agree more.

    Buy nice or buy twice.
    "The farther one gets into the wilderness, the greater is the attraction of its lonely freedom."

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    8

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    I use a Celestron Trailseeker 100. It's pretty big for a spotter and I mainly use it at the range. The price is good at around $500-600 and the image quality is good too. Though I am curious how it would stack up to high end glass. Also the availability is limited to Amazon since lower mainland telescope & camera shops that deal with Celestron seem to be unable to get their spotters. (Also Amazon is the cheapest.)

    Mike

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    region 9
    Posts
    11,581

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Quote Originally Posted by KodiakHntr View Post
    I carry a Swarovski 20-60x65, and it is not bad glass. If I were doing it over again, I would wait and save more money and buy the Leica.

    That said, I have used the Vortex Razor side by side at last light a few times with my Swarovski, and the image to my eye was a bit sharper. That was likely due to the fine focus on the Vortex vs the slightly coarser single focus ring of the Swarovski.


    If you are a sheep hunter, and going to be using it every year, spend the money. If you aren't super serious about it then the Vortex will likely do fine for counting tines on muleys or moose.
    I have the Vortex Razor 65 mm and really like the fine focus knob...I am very impressed with the quality of the scope but then again I've never compared it to higher end spotters...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern BC
    Posts
    3,094

    Re: Spotting Scopes

    Quote Originally Posted by HarryToolips View Post
    I have the Vortex Razor 65 mm and really like the fine focus knob...I am very impressed with the quality of the scope but then again I've never compared it to higher end spotters...
    Yeah, they definitely got the fine focus correct on the Vortex. It is reasonable glass for sure, when you consider the price point.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •