Quote Originally Posted by boxhitch View Post
40, you touched on several issues in one post, not going to quote it and give it traction

You probably already know why the regs select for a sustainable hunt, why try to muddy up that one ?

Not trying to muddy anything … if anything let's have some clarity.

Do you think a guided rich dude would have had that ram taken away? That's not a rhetorical question BTW! … but let's pick on a young resident hunter to make a bureaucratic point.

And just another quick question … what has sustainability got to do with it? You must be familiar with the "Skeena Model", which has allowed for ridiculously high quotas in Region 6 that have nothing to do with sustainability.

To be clear … the ram is legal and was a good one to take. Problem is, the bureaucrats want to further their personal agenda with least risk.

I hope the family of the young man pursues an appeal of this B.S.