Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: National park "consultation page"

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Haney,BC and anywhere you can hunt in BC out of the rain !
    Posts
    8,658

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    I got er done !
    7mm PRC soon to be the most popular cartridge in North America

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Horsefly BC
    Posts
    2,253

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    The NDP and Greens don't give a rats ass what we think. Just watch.
    The challenge of retirement is how to spend time without spending money.
    The worst day slinging lead is still better than the best day working.
    Look around is there someone you can introduce to shooting because that’s the only way we will buck the anti gun trend sweeping Canada! "tigrr 2006"


  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    princeton
    Posts
    668

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    A sad state of affairs to be so helpess. Imagine a governement that does whatever they feel..........I hope canada wakes up
    Proud member of the fringe minority!

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    N. Okanagan
    Posts
    14,182

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    Maybe an 'information road block' on the road to Apex would get some media attention
    Never say whoa in the middle of a mud hole

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    52

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    Done. Let's hope it makes a difference.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    909

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    Anyone else notice they missed the L in Similkameen at the top of the page?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,518

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    Quote Originally Posted by islandhunter View Post
    A sad state of affairs to be so helpess. Imagine a governement that does whatever they feel..........I hope canada wakes up
    Problem is, it's not just the government.
    IT's people who really don't know anything about hunting or just dislike hunters that the government is also trying to
    appease, if you ask me.
    Provincial Park was all that was needed.
    And throwing "Reserve" at the end just shows just how much of a 2 tier system they want to make things here in BC.
    Think they have forgotten who pays the taxes??

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    N. Okanagan
    Posts
    14,182

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    wow, 17 comments so far, by a handful of contributors
    underwhelming apathy at its best
    Never say whoa in the middle of a mud hole

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    92

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    A dramatic use of language, since consultation, by definition, is the opposite of helpless. You are in deed getting your voice heard, which again is the opposite of the insertion that the government does whatever it wants. Yet another opportunity to be heard will be next october (election). In our democratic system majority rules, even if that majority does not share your beliefs.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,518

    Re: National park "consultation page"

    Quote Originally Posted by stosto View Post
    A dramatic use of language, since consultation, by definition, is the opposite of helpless. You are in deed getting your voice heard, which again is the opposite of the insertion that the government does whatever it wants. Yet another opportunity to be heard will be next october (election). In our democratic system majority rules, even if that majority does not share your beliefs.
    That's a fair statement, but you only have to look at the "consultation" that had taken place in regards to the Gbear hunt and that outcome.
    Who received those emails to give opinions??
    Anyways, you are right, next election will be the time to have a voice.
    But as far as being listened to consultation wise, I think the ears are pointed a different direction.
    They call it "selective hearing", imo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •