Re: road deactivations for sensitive habitat
Originally Posted by
.264winmag
Its not the roads that are the issue. Here's some fun facts about Sweden. Sweden is half the size of BC. Sweden logs the piss out of their country, with apparently much worse forest practice codes than BC. In the 90's their government passed a law leaving the practices and reforestation up to the logging companies. Their reforestation practices are good from I gather. Sweden has around 350,000 moose with an average of 150,000 harvested annually by hunters. BC has around 170,000 moose total and an average annual harvest of 10,000.
So how can a country half the size of BC have twice the amount of moose and harvest almost as many as we have in the entire province annually? All the while with horrid Forest harvesting practices?
Sweden has a wolf population of 340.
BC has 8500 wolves.
Pull back as many roads as you like. It should be as efficient at stopping wolves from eating ungulates as pissing on a forest fire.
8500 hungry wolves and everywhere is a road when the snow freezes up.
These numbers may not be bang on, but it paints a decent picture.
no where did I say that the wolves don't need culling or are not a problem. What I said is that they use roads same as us for easier access to game.
"Target archery is seeing how far away you can get and still hit the bull's eye;
Bowhunting is seeing how close you can get and never miss your mark."
"A man's got to know his limitations"