Sustenance hunt?????

[Weatherby Fan]

Another TROLL ! MR 4 Posts ! RJ

Awe Phuck it I’m going hunting at Spences Bridge, I seen a cpl dandy Rams last week......

[willyqbc]

CO's won't do anything, RCMP won't do anything,

Thread after thread the rcmp and co's get bashed for not doing anything.....theres a reason for that.

In most instances, like the shooting of elk on private property thread from a while back....the native tresspassers/poachers stayed on scene waiting for the authorities to arrive. why you may ask? Because they WANT TO BE CHARGED!!!!

Many are purposely flaunting the law and pushing boundaries in an effort to get it before the courts. In the example of trespass hunting...they can lose that one in court 100 times....they only have to win once and its then law and removes the shackles from any who might have been holding back because they just werent sure if they would get in trouble.

How do you think it became legal for the FN to pitlamp? It went to court and they won

The authorities do not charge the FN for infractions, because the lesser of 2 evils is to hope some believe it is wrong and illegal and therefore don't do it, rather than to have it legally sanctioned by the courts and open the floodgates.

The RCMP and CO's are making the less shitty choice in an impossible, no win situation.

Chris

[TexasWalker]

So does anybody have a picture of hunter and ram in question?
Or is this just a steaming pile of bs?

[Weatherby Fan]

Thread after thread the rcmp and co's get bashed for not doing anything.....theres a reason for that.

In most instances, like the shooting of elk on private property thread from a while back....the native tresspassers/poachers stayed on scene waiting for the authorities to arrive. why you may ask? Because they WANT TO BE CHARGED!!!!

Many are purposely flaunting the law and pushing boundaries in an effort to get it before the courts. In the example of trespass hunting...they can lose that one in court 100 times....they only have to win once and its then law and removes the shackles from any who might have been holding back because they just werent sure if they would get in trouble.

How do you think it became legal for the FN to pitlamp? It went to court and they won

The authorities do not charge the FN for infractions, because the lesser of 2 evils is to hope some believe it is wrong and illegal and therefore don't do it, rather than to have it legally sanctioned by the courts and open the floodgates.

The RCMP and CO's are making the less shitty choice in an impossible, no win situation.

Chris

well said Chris, I’ll say it again, the First Nation is a country with in a Country, they can do what they want, make their own laws, abide by the laws they see fit, so they aren’t Canadians they are First Nations

[REMINGTON JIM]

So does anybody have a picture of hunter and ram in question?
Or is this just a steaming pile of bs?

Ha ! LOL Hes Back ! RJ

[j270wsm]

Willyqbc....why was the name of the hunter removed from my original post?? He has not been accused of doing anything illegal!! All I did was post the name of FN who harvested a huge ram under the guise of sustenance. Is it against the law or forum rules to post people's names??

[LBM]

So does anybody have a picture of hunter and ram in question?
Or is this just a steaming pile of bs?

Go to post #12

[willyqbc]

quoting the second post on the thread

well calling someone by name out without any proof other then hearsay on the internet probably wont go over well..

...bout sums it up!

Chris

[TexasWalker]

Go to post #12

And??
Doesn't prove anything.

[LBM]

And??
Doesn't prove anything.

Are you insinuating he is a liar. Maybe ask him if he has a picture.