Alliance ?
So the Fed happened to have the same opinion about a conservation issue as others sitting at a roundtable on the subject
Haters will be haters I guess
Never say whoa in the middle of a mud hole
This is it.
I'm a member of the BCWF for hunting, fishing and conservation reasons, the CCFR and CSSA for gun reasons and the CPC for federal political reasons. None of the organizations are perfect and none do everything exactly the way I want it, but I don't stamp my foot and abandon them whenever someone starts some drama about them.
Knowledgeable shooters agree- The 375 Ruger is the NEW KING of all 375 caliber cartridges. ALL HAIL THE NEW KING!
Your Right Box,
I understand the BCWF, and it's direction of helping wildlife, and yes, if it aligns with RainCoast, then in my opinion,
that's "fantastic" (as vanderzam would say).
I am confused by some when they see that bcwf/raincoast work together.
To me, it says "WE BOTH AGREE" on the "solution".
That's great folks, if you can get past the alliance.
And, when it has to come to the next issue, there probably "won't be an alliance", cause we all know RainCoast will have a different agenda at times against hunting, and, if you are all to dumb to realize BCWF will not go that direction, that they want hunting here in BC, then I don't know what to say.
As for "our Representation" (nonFN/Residents/GO's), we do need a voice, now!
There is nothing wrong in supporting BCWF, if you ask me.
There is no reason you all cant support both, should that day come.
I never asked that people abandon BCWF.
I had just hoped that we might find some past folks who know how to get organized etc, so that we can get representation.
It is unfortunate, that BCWF cant get "rebranded" somehow????? (but I understand the difficulty)
Anyways, I am never going to kick bcwf and it members, and their hard work.
And it is so very obvious, that there are a "few members here" that all they want to do, is see bcwf membership crash.
Funny thing is, it is no different then many of us wanting to see the GOABC "crash"....hmmm.
That's where I just shake my head, as in the end, we all lose representation, and we keep losing areas to hunt.
All of us.
BCWF is the best for experience with all this stuff, herd it b4 many times and talked with all the important people involved in all groups.
-- know more about this BC province now then ever b4 also , so don't be putting this BCWF down in anyway if you hunt in B.C.
Jel -- learn to have conversation about all these topics, with the players involved, in the whole of B.C. thru the BCWF. Already well ahead in many areas.
This is how I see it. BCWF is unable/ unwilling to get into the political ring both provincially ( grizzly hunt) and federally with the current issues regarding the FN blockades for LEH moose. I am a member of BCWF as well as SCI Westcoast. I will try not to step on any toes. SCI has no political affiliation they are a hunter first group ( it's in the name) always fighting for our right to hunt. We've had a Rep from SCI Canada lobbying in both Victoria and Ottawa trying to protect our rights. They oppose the Grizz ban citing closure was not based on scientific evidence. As a group we believe a major issue contributing to lower numbers of ungulates is the lack of predetor control. At this time I'm not sure what is happening in regards to the illegal blockades for Moose, but I believe they will be on top of it trying to make some headway for us the lowly and almost forgotten resident hunter.
Tight groups Safe hunts
I just went SCI’s website to see how to join, and there is zero info and dead links. It’s a joke from what their site shows. I would join right now if they had their chit together. We definitely need a STRONG voice at this time when every FN group is getting involved in shutting down hunting in “their” territory. I was born and raised here in B.C. too, so this is also MY territory!