Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: My recent letter to the BCWF

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Quesnel
    Posts
    1,573

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenthumbed View Post
    I agree that resident hunters need a strong voice, but so does wildlife. If you guys want to throw your weight behind another organization then that is great! This does not mean you need to cease being a member of the BCWF. I'm a member of multiple organizations. Each one is for slightly different reasons. One should not forsake BCWF because it doesn't stand for everything that you feel is right. It is difficult for one organization to do it all.
    Makes sense to me, already a BCWF member but like others have some concerns on their alliance with Raincoast

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    N. Okanagan
    Posts
    14,182

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Alliance ?
    So the Fed happened to have the same opinion about a conservation issue as others sitting at a roundtable on the subject
    Haters will be haters I guess
    Never say whoa in the middle of a mud hole

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pemberton BC
    Posts
    1,602

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenthumbed View Post
    I agree that resident hunters need a strong voice, but so does wildlife. If you guys want to throw your weight behind another organization then that is great! This does not mean you need to cease being a member of the BCWF. I'm a member of multiple organizations. Each one is for slightly different reasons. One should not forsake BCWF because it doesn't stand for everything that you feel is right. It is difficult for one organization to do it all.
    This is it.

    I'm a member of the BCWF for hunting, fishing and conservation reasons, the CCFR and CSSA for gun reasons and the CPC for federal political reasons. None of the organizations are perfect and none do everything exactly the way I want it, but I don't stamp my foot and abandon them whenever someone starts some drama about them.
    Knowledgeable shooters agree- The 375 Ruger is the NEW KING of all 375 caliber cartridges. ALL HAIL THE NEW KING!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,518

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Quote Originally Posted by boxhitch View Post
    Alliance ?
    So the Fed happened to have the same opinion about a conservation issue as others sitting at a roundtable on the subject
    Haters will be haters I guess
    Your Right Box,
    I understand the BCWF, and it's direction of helping wildlife, and yes, if it aligns with RainCoast, then in my opinion,
    that's "fantastic" (as vanderzam would say).
    I am confused by some when they see that bcwf/raincoast work together.
    To me, it says "WE BOTH AGREE" on the "solution".
    That's great folks, if you can get past the alliance.
    And, when it has to come to the next issue, there probably "won't be an alliance", cause we all know RainCoast will have a different agenda at times against hunting, and, if you are all to dumb to realize BCWF will not go that direction, that they want hunting here in BC, then I don't know what to say.

    As for "our Representation" (nonFN/Residents/GO's), we do need a voice, now!
    There is nothing wrong in supporting BCWF, if you ask me.
    There is no reason you all cant support both, should that day come.
    I never asked that people abandon BCWF.
    I had just hoped that we might find some past folks who know how to get organized etc, so that we can get representation.
    It is unfortunate, that BCWF cant get "rebranded" somehow????? (but I understand the difficulty)

    Anyways, I am never going to kick bcwf and it members, and their hard work.
    And it is so very obvious, that there are a "few members here" that all they want to do, is see bcwf membership crash.
    Funny thing is, it is no different then many of us wanting to see the GOABC "crash"....hmmm.

    That's where I just shake my head, as in the end, we all lose representation, and we keep losing areas to hunt.
    All of us.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Kamloops Country just south of Heaven
    Posts
    23,994

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    BCWF is the best for experience with all this stuff, herd it b4 many times and talked with all the important people involved in all groups.
    -- know more about this BC province now then ever b4 also , so don't be putting this BCWF down in anyway if you hunt in B.C.
    Jel -- learn to have conversation about all these topics, with the players involved, in the whole of B.C. thru the BCWF. Already well ahead in many areas.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Langley BC
    Posts
    65

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    This is how I see it. BCWF is unable/ unwilling to get into the political ring both provincially ( grizzly hunt) and federally with the current issues regarding the FN blockades for LEH moose. I am a member of BCWF as well as SCI Westcoast. I will try not to step on any toes. SCI has no political affiliation they are a hunter first group ( it's in the name) always fighting for our right to hunt. We've had a Rep from SCI Canada lobbying in both Victoria and Ottawa trying to protect our rights. They oppose the Grizz ban citing closure was not based on scientific evidence. As a group we believe a major issue contributing to lower numbers of ungulates is the lack of predetor control. At this time I'm not sure what is happening in regards to the illegal blockades for Moose, but I believe they will be on top of it trying to make some headway for us the lowly and almost forgotten resident hunter.
    Tight groups Safe hunts

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Quesnel
    Posts
    1,573

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Quote Originally Posted by boxhitch View Post
    Alliance ?
    So the Fed happened to have the same opinion about a conservation issue as others sitting at a roundtable on the subject
    Haters will be haters I guess
    Alliance yes, hater no

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    region 9
    Posts
    11,591

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    Quote Originally Posted by Billybird View Post
    This is how I see it. BCWF is unable/ unwilling to get into the political ring both provincially ( grizzly hunt) and federally with the current issues regarding the FN blockades for LEH moose. I am a member of BCWF as well as SCI Westcoast. I will try not to step on any toes. SCI has no political affiliation they are a hunter first group ( it's in the name) always fighting for our right to hunt. We've had a Rep from SCI Canada lobbying in both Victoria and Ottawa trying to protect our rights. They oppose the Grizz ban citing closure was not based on scientific evidence. As a group we believe a major issue contributing to lower numbers of ungulates is the lack of predetor control. At this time I'm not sure what is happening in regards to the illegal blockades for Moose, but I believe they will be on top of it trying to make some headway for us the lowly and almost forgotten resident hunter.
    Good to hear, I will be supporting both SCI westcoast and the BCWF in the future....

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Top of the 395
    Posts
    1,711

    Re: My recent letter to the BCWF

    I just went SCI’s website to see how to join, and there is zero info and dead links. It’s a joke from what their site shows. I would join right now if they had their chit together. We definitely need a STRONG voice at this time when every FN group is getting involved in shutting down hunting in “their” territory. I was born and raised here in B.C. too, so this is also MY territory!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •