Re: NStQ First Nations, B.C., Canada advance to final treaty negotiations
Originally Posted by
jassmine
You certainly haven't looked at any of the studies that I have posted many of which do contain data.
The vast majority of research conducted on humans cannot be blind or double blinds due to the ethical concerns of providing or not providing adequate treatment would entail. That's why you need to use more sophisticated statistical modelling when doing studies like that. But to negate the research that is conducted because it doesn't meet what you believe is essential in all studies is a silly argument akin to those that deny evolution or climate change.
What could be more unbiased and ethical than comparing diagnoses of the same patient before and after learning their race?
Statistics - “torture numbers and they’ll confess anything”
I didn’t say that all studies require what I outlined, if I did feel free to quote it. However, my dismissing overly complicated statistical models is the opposite of silly, it’s logical.
As as an academic you should know that peer reviewers often nitpick methods and that’s all I’m doing. There’s no need to lump me in with climate change or evolution deniers because you don’t agree with me.
Last edited by Livewire322; 08-09-2018 at 02:48 PM.
If it cant be done with one shot, it shouldn't be done.
"grab large claw hammer - put against butt cheek , pry head out of ass with claws...then go back to school..."