Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bcwf-fisheries and oceans canada's deception over species at risk protection

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    254

    Bcwf-fisheries and oceans canada's deception over species at risk protection




    The BC Wildlife Federation and conservation partners have been calling on the federal government to list and manage Thompson and Chilcotin River steelhead under the Species At Risk Act (SARA). In February of this year, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) concluded an emergency assessment and found both populations are at imminent risk of extinction.


    The BCWF wants fishing that intercepts endangered steelhead in the approaches to and in the Fraser River to stop. In 2017, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) approved commercial chum salmon gill-net fishing which allowed up to 20 percent mortality of the returning Thompson Chilcotin steelhead. This is a low estimate since there are other net fisheries on the river not accounted for.


    In a May 8, 2018 letter to Harvey Andrusak, the president of the BCWF, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada states a proposed four-week rolling window closure for salmon fisheries of "approximately four weeks is expected to protect 90 percent of the Interior Fraser River steelhead."


    Government is not telling the truth about these closures. A DFO document, titled, "Proposed 2018 Fisheries Management Measures to Support Recovery of Interior Fraser River Steelhead (IFR SH)," states that it expects 90 percent of the IFR SH return will only be protected 43 out of 100 years. So DFO only intends to protect 90 percent of IFR SH less than half the time. This unacceptably misleading.


    Provincial government (the agency charged with steelhead management) data show the proposed rolling window will protect less than 60 percent of returning IFR steelhead. The historical data on run timing and migration suggests a rolling fisheries closure of greater than two months is required to protect 90 percent of the run -- worlds apart from what DFO has told the public.


    DFO states it will manage these fish through its Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP) while it reviews the COSEWIC assessment.


    This approach is similar to what DFO did with Sakinaw Lake Sockeye (which now sees 0-1 fish return per year) and Cultus Lake Sockeye which has suffered a 40 percent decline since 2002. A recent paper released by the UVIC Environmental Law Clinic conducted on behalf of the BC Wildlife Federation showed that the Federal Government's approach of ignoring the Species at Risk Act in favour of IFMP is an abject failure for salmon and steelhead.


    The letter sent to Andrusak also states this approach affords steelhead more protection than interior coho. Upper Fraser River coho collapsed in 1994 and never recovered. Coho fishing has been closed since the late 90s; DFO has "managed" these fish through the IFMP with no meaningful signs of recovery. More importantly, IFR steelhead are at imminent risk of extinction, while coho are not.


    The BCWF fears that the agency responsible for our wild salmon is deliberately deceiving the public to justify the status quo, and is willfully pushing IFR steelhead towards extinction.


    Andrusak said, "It is a sad day when our federal government claims to protect 90 percent of endangered runs, when the data suggests it is only protecting them 43 percent of the time."
    Make sure to Like and Share us on Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/BCWildlifeFederation

    Twitter- @BCWildlife


  2. Site Sponsor

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mid vancouver Island
    Posts
    346

    Re: Bcwf-fisheries and oceans canada's deception over species at risk protection

    Plus-- you have a bunch of computer biologists that have no real experience with any of our fisheries.. I am using a broad paintbrush I know, but its rare to find a DFO manager that sport fishes, or has solid links to the commercial industry. I feel that to them-- its just a job. ( To some of you DFO types that do read these posts and fish and hunt, my apologies-- but you must know who I am talking about )

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    108 ranch
    Posts
    963

    Re: Bcwf-fisheries and oceans canada's deception over species at risk protection

    Well I just have to come out and say it......DFO has to go !.....They are not stewards of our fish...They are but slaves of politicians and just do there bidding..We need a complete over haul in Canada of our Fishery Management structure...East coast should manage their own...The West coast manage their own and the Arctic managed by the Northern Native people...Ottawa is not competent and they are corrupt...Dennis...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •