https://oceola.ca/
http://bcwf.net/index.php
http://www.wildsheepsociety.net/
I Give my Heart to my Family....
My Mind to my Work.......
But My Soul Belongs to the Mountains.....
80:100 is what I was told by the Skeena bio. That was right after the first blockades went up.
Locals definitely don't like competition for moose, which is funny because they hunt them in the winter on sleds & by vehicle in the spring as soon as the road opens up.
Is it possible to have a 80:100 bull/cow ratio on a hunted population of moose with a licensed season for bulls only?
With numbers like that it would be suspect that either very few bulls are being harvested or an almost equal number of cows are being killed.
I wonder if all the counts were carried out using the same methods to ensure an accurate comparison.
What’s the overall moose population done, gone up, gone down or held steady?
Those would be some interesting questions to ask that bio.
https://oceola.ca/
http://bcwf.net/index.php
http://www.wildsheepsociety.net/
I Give my Heart to my Family....
My Mind to my Work.......
But My Soul Belongs to the Mountains.....
Not really. Region 6:
Average moose hunters 1970s = 6498
Average moose hunters 1980s = 5146
Average moose hunters 1990s = 5092
Average moose hunters 2000s = 4296
Region 6 moose hunter numbers have been going steadily downward.
Reality and perception are often two different things.
That doesn’t really make sense, unless the numbers you are using are based on all of Region 6.
Then again if your numbers are for the entire region and you factor in all the limited hunts available in parts of the region it is possible that hunters have shifted to the areas that are still open to moose hunters that do not have to draw a tag.
It still seems odd that the bull/cow ratio in Skeena North is 80:100 unless the area being inventoried has a large number of cow moose being killed as well as bulls.
The numbers don’t make sense unless the entire moose population is being hunted and if that’s the case shouldn’t we as concerned individuals be asking the bio’s in that region what the overall inventory is and if the population is dropping, what is going on?
The other possibility could be that even thow overall hunter numbers have dropped by one third, as your numbers show, is it a reality that hunter efficiency has increased due to increased access and technology in the time period you are quoting the hunter numbers from?
From what I can see, Region 6 North was not highly accessible 40 to 50 years ago but maybe I’m wrong and there are less hunters going there today than in the past.
Trying to wrap my head around some facts and numbers that just don’t make sense.
604redneck:
Nothing wrong with licking leaves if you ventured far on a hunt and you're out of water..... And if moose hunting goes bye bye in the Yukon, there really is no hope!
IMO, we need to continue and increase our education of non hunters and stay polite and engaged with antis. I know there are also many newbies being trained weekly; companies are pumping them out now! (Not like the old days when you had to find one of the old-timers from the range to take the FAC test!).
Hopefully these "Hipster hunters" help our cause, (though I have not enjoyed them following me 'cuz they don't know where to hunt).
Bottom line is we need to continue hunting, showing the benefits and relevance of our chosen pursuit, and mentoring new hunters well versed in ethics and conservation.
Last edited by deer nut; 02-12-2018 at 11:04 AM.
^^^well said.....we need to get the BC Liberals in fast before the NDGreenies screw everything up on us....