Re: Funded Management for Our Future
Originally Posted by
dana
so what would you rather have, large clearcuts or large blowdown fire traps? Have you ever tried to walk in heavy pine blowdown? I'm lucky, I get to it often in my job. I can assure you wildlife don't enjoy it. So, if we didn't log all that pine, that is indeed what you would have. Think of what the wildfires would have been like this past summer then? Hmmm, i guess that you like watching your house burn maybe. You can tell your wife not to worry, the wildlife habitat created where your house once stood will be amazing? Seriously, you want that. Just because something looks 'fragmented' from the air, doesn't mean that is the fact. Did you know the science behind forestry in this province is to actually mimic natural distubance types? Oh yea, i remember, the only science that counts is the one that so and so is preaching today not the one that is actually used by government for managing trees. We get upset at the antis for not allowing us to manage with science but seems hunters want to do the same when it comes to something they know so little about, forestry. All because it 'looks ugly' hahaha.
My original point was to reduce some of the unwanted spur roads but you choose to go on the defensive and blow this all out of proportion. I’d suggest just reading what I wrote and try not reading too deaply into it. Reducing extra spur roads, predator control ect ect are all problems being faced.
If you can pack it in, You can pack it out !!!
UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL !!!
BCWF
WSSBC
CCFR
" The secret of change is to focus all your energy, not on fighting the old, but building on the new"
Socrates.