And here we go again

[BigfishCanada]

"Due to First Nations hunting rights, COS says there was no Wildlife Act violations, so there was no reason to seize the animal.
"
Question: Are they allowed to hunt on private property, are they allowed to hunt within city limits, are they allowed to shoot a firearm within city limits in urban area?

How can the CO say no wildlife violations took place?

[BigfishCanada]

I mean look at the street, its a city orchard

https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.49688...7i13312!8i6656

[Wentrot]

Pretty clear the FN can pretty well do as they please without consequence.

[BCJaeger]

"Due to First Nations hunting rights, COS says there was no Wildlife Act violations, so there was no reason to seize the animal.
"
Question: Are they allowed to hunt on private property, are they allowed to hunt within city limits, are they allowed to shoot a firearm within city limits in urban area?

How can the CO say no wildlife violations took place?

I guess it is simply because FN have a right to hunt. So a CO can't seize the animal based on the Wildlife Act. But I guess the RCMP could seize it to secure evidence for violation of the Firearms Act, bylaws etc. Anyhow seizing the firearm certainly hurts more. And that's what the RCMP did.

[Walksalot]

I guess it is simply because FN have a right to hunt. So a CO can't seize the animal based on the Wildlife Act. But I guess the RCMP could seize it to secure evidence for violation of the Firearms Act, bylaws etc. Anyhow seizing the firearm certainly hurts more. And that's what the RCMP did.

Does the Firearms Act protect fenced private land outside the city boundaries?

[rocksteady]

"Due to First Nations hunting rights, COS says there was no Wildlife Act violations, so there was no reason to seize the animal.
"
Question: Are they allowed to hunt on private property, are they allowed to hunt within city limits, are they allowed to shoot a firearm within city limits in urban area?

How can the CO say no wildlife violations took place?

Because FN do not recognize the wildlife act as one of their statutes ..

[Bugle M In]

Because FN do not recognize the wildlife act as one of their statutes ..

Ya, but their eyesight's pretty clear when it comes to recognizing "our cash"....just saying....
term is called "cherry picking".

[rocksteady]

Yup.. you got that right

[Darksith]

private land, didn't this just happen with an elk in that part of the province as well?

[Wild one]

private land, didn't this just happen with an elk in that part of the province as well?

Nothing done about that either kinda gives an example to FN that it's OK

FN hunting rights are one thing but the others laws broken should be enforced.