Knowledgeable shooters agree- The 375 Ruger is the NEW KING of all 375 caliber cartridges. ALL HAIL THE NEW KING!
If you are willing to take this stance, well guess what, you need to do a hell of a lot more if you want any respect with hunters on here..
The stage is set for you to bat it out of the park, lets see if your up to the challenge?
You are a scientist, back it up, and try to educate the uneducated....
One hundred thousand hunters can translate to one million voters, if that's what your here for?..
He's anything but a hunter.
More like another, Rain Coast Sociopath Fraud. Living off the prevails of his chronic lies, like the rest of them...
It's an issue, because these sociopath environmentalist's, will dilute the facts.
To the point you or Joe public, won't know them any more..
They count on that big time..
Dude, why did you align with the NDP? The Greens had an opportunity to show the people of BC what they stand for by being a swing vote on controversial issues such as this. But you joined the Socialists and your party will be tainted by their lunacy, (such as this) for years to come.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
Collectivism is Slavery
Support a Woman's right to arm herself.
Jan 13th
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj9Pm8-tFuU
Without reading all 23 pages but having read the article, is it stating that residents and nonresidents can't possess head, hide nor hair? So anyone who gets an LEH can only take home the meat?
Islandwanderer:
"lack of understanding of the reasoning behind this legislation, unwilling to look for common ground,"
Science is the common ground in this case. As far as the reasoning behind the legislation goes the NDP has already said it's because they don't think the hunt is socially acceptable. The danger with basing wildlife policy on what's socially acceptable is that wildlife will suffer.
You and your party are choosing what is socially acceptable to a segment of society and ignoring science. Would you recommend the same approach to say, climate change?
Anyway, make a reasonable case for the ban. I'm dying to read it.
Rob Chipman
"The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders" - Ed Abbey
"Grown men do not need leaders" - also Ed Abbey