to be clear in a perfect world non resident hunter would be eligible for 1%..not 10%. World ain't perfect.
to be clear in a perfect world non resident hunter would be eligible for 1%..not 10%. World ain't perfect.
It is well to try and journey ones road and to fight with the air.Man must die! At worst he can die a little sooner." (H Ryder Haggard)
You got a plastic kayak? Sit down and do some math.,prove me wrong!
It is well to try and journey ones road and to fight with the air.Man must die! At worst he can die a little sooner." (H Ryder Haggard)
To make a claim like this, I will have to ask you to show what numbers you used and show your math equations so we can see how you arrived at your .005% answer. math is my thing and for the life of me I can't figure out how you arrived at that number.
In simple terms, 100,000 resident hunters gaining .005% opportunity translates to 5 animals....I do beleive that the outfitters quota is alot more that 5 animals.
You might want to go back to your pencil and paper and recalculate your numbers.
Last edited by btridge; 08-03-2017 at 07:53 PM.
Show me..math is your thing put the numbers down.let the chips fall. Have you even picked up a pencil?
It is well to try and journey ones road and to fight with the air.Man must die! At worst he can die a little sooner." (H Ryder Haggard)
The enemies were made when the original allocation policy was dumped so as to invent the new on. The old policy gave the GO's no bottom end. When the GO's got their way with the new policy they still weren't happy so they did an end-run with the Liberal culls and screwed resident hunters even worse.
Time to resurrect the original policy and force the bureaucrats to implement it. That's all that was needed in the first place!!
All the fear-mongering by the GO apologists is getting sillier by the post.
Do the math on an island bull elk draw at 200:1, one draw per year, and the outfitter getting 40%. Say a 10 bull harvest every 6 years for both resident and non-resident. Instead of 200:1 at 40%, it would be 133:1 at 10%, if my math is correct.
This doesn't even look at success rates if 75 bull moose are allocated to residents in region 6 let's say, and only on in 3 are successful, that means 225 hunters will get to actually hunt, and hopefully 75 tags are filled. Bump it up to 90 draws, and 270 hunters get to go hunting. That is a significant difference.
What about kamloops sheep? 1000:1? With those odds, a non resident should never be able to hunt that population of animals, period. Cut out the guides quota, and those odds drop to 500:1, or close to it.
Maybe be my math is completely wrong. Show us what you have horshur, as I'm always willing to learn.
The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.
100,000 resident hunters X your .005%=5, but the LEH is set up for multiple hunters to have an opportunity to acheive the harvest of the AAH based on success rates, so If the LEH authorization ratio was a mear 5 to1, then of coarse that would mean that your .005% would translate to only ONE animal. Your hypothesis sir is wrong! and yes I have picked up a pencil....Have YOU?
Last edited by btridge; 08-03-2017 at 08:31 PM.