Its ALL BullSh*t ! there should NOT be any special HUNTING priviledges for any one ! including any and all Natives- First Nations and or Indians ! jmo RJ
Its ALL BullSh*t ! there should NOT be any special HUNTING priviledges for any one ! including any and all Natives- First Nations and or Indians ! jmo RJ
$2000 is pathetic. That's 6 hours of a lawyers time. $200 000 and a bankruptcy would be more appropriate. Let her shiver in the cold and burn sheep fat for light when her hydro is cut off.
A 2000 $ fine is not a very substantial deterrent for "anyone", if the reason for killing game illegally is because they are selling
parts in the black market"
As stated by others, selling a set of Ram horns for 20,000$ under the table is much more tempting, than worrying about
paying a 2000$ fine from time to time.
These type of people don't care whether they hold on to their "hunting license's" or losing them as punishment.
And we wonder why animals on the planet are going "extinct".
some ambiguous statements:
Crown prosecutor Joel Gold said on Nov. 9, 2014, conservation officers found two of the three dead rams within 10 metres of a logging road in an area north of Kamloops Lake while the third was about 500 metres away on a slope.
They had been killed the previous day. While meat was removed from two of the animals, most of the meat from the third ram was left on the hillside.
Kato, a member of the Ashcroft Indian Band , was originally charged with three counts of failing to remove edible portions of a carcass, but two of the counts were dropped in return for her pleading guilty to the single charge.
Judge Chris Cleaveley sentenced Kato to a $2,000 fine. All but $100 of that amount will go to the B.C. Habitat Conservation Trust Fund. As part of the deal, she forfeited her right to trophy parts — the cape and the skull and horns.
Kato did bring the head and horns to ministry officials for identification and reporting. They were seized.
Seems they wouldn't charge 3 counts failing to remove meat if it was only the one ram that was left on the hill? Then the "seized head and cape" are stated as singular, not plural. So was she only charged $2000 and allowed to keep the other 2 rams? And nobody would have heard about this if she stopped at the 2 roadside rams? Sad
doesnt even make sence to have 3 counts of leaving meat when their own words say only 1 had left meat on it.
another one that was odd is she took them in to be reported as law says., is like she had no clue she was actualy breaking a law, i doubt most have their inspected if they knew they were illegal. something there dont make sence either
and what was comments about selling parts for..i saw nothing that said that was her intentions. what brought that up?
we seem to be missing the 3rd side, the truth lol