So many flaws in his arguments from taxpayers "subsidizing a hunt that they oppose" to looking at ONE study in ONE area of BC being the Great Bear Rainforest. How many grizz tags are issued in that area? No sh*t the revenue and benefits from eco-tourism/bear viewing in THAT area is going to be higher as there is not a ton of tags issued.

Is he talking the entire Great Bear Rainforest area....or specific areas?

He is criticizing the province as a whole, perhaps present viewing versus hunting revenue for grizz in the province as a whole? One can excerpt from a unique area, not present all the facts and jump in front of a camera a spew off.