Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Shipping guns?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    East Kootenay
    Posts
    1,364

    Re: Shipping guns?

    Yeah, I have not used Fedex before, they are just a big name alternative that came to mind. Mea culpa, thanks for the clarification! I'll note to always check policies not just before using a service or making a purchase (I always do what I can to insure my money does not go to antis) yet also prior recommending things to others, likewise.

    Still I truly despise Canada Post and would rather pay whatever than use them for anything, ever. They're terrible and I can not recommend them. If fedex are antis - then I'll scratch those clowns off the potential service provider list for sure! Canpar is awesome and will ship ammo and everything, whatever you got!

    Thank You

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    in the woods
    Posts
    1,610

    Re: Shipping guns?

    all the other delivery can open any package for any reason. canada post cant without warrants. i will never ship with others.
    been even more bad reports by the competitons to canada post

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    East Kootenay
    Posts
    1,364

    Re: Shipping guns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonz View Post
    all the other delivery can open any package for any reason. canada post cant without warrants. i will never ship with others.
    been even more bad reports by the competitons to canada post
    Please provide a link to the source of this information. It is the first I have heard of this.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    in the woods
    Posts
    1,610

    Re: Shipping guns?

    http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information...04_09_01_e.asp

    "Opening mail - right to privacy must be first consideration

    In March 2001, it was revealed that Canada Customs officials were opening mail coming into Canada and passing the information on to Citizenship and Immigration Canada. The sanctity of personal correspondence is a cornerstone of privacy, and Canadians do not expect that their letters sent through the mail will be opened by anyone except the intended recipient. We don't live in one of those countries where mail is routinely opened by the authorities-or so we thought. I immediately looked into this matter.

    Many people were surprised to learn that the opening of mail by Customs is lawful, if the mail weighs over 30 grams. If it is less than 30 grams, the Customs Act prohibits opening it without either a search warrant or the addressee's consent. But as long as the mail, whether a package or personal correspondence, weighs more than 30 grams, Customs inspectors may open it if they believe that it contains contraband or false documents. Any mail considered suspicious from an immigration standpoint is turned over to immigration officials for examination and further action.

    It is of great concern to me that this arbitrary and artificial weight distinction allows the opening of, not just packages, but private correspondence. Correspondence should be treated with the greatest possible respect for privacy. The weight of the correspondence should not make a difference. Sending a letter by any form of "priority post" requires placing it in a large and comparatively heavy outer envelope that by itself can often put the item in the "over 30 grams" category. A letter should not be considered any less "mail," and less deserving of privacy protection, simply because the sender wanted to ensure its timely and safe arrival, or for that matter because it's lengthy and therefore heavier.

    I made these concerns known to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, and made the following recommendations

    * Where Customs officials detect, in an envelope weighing more than 30 grams, a solid object that appears to be something other than correspondence, opening it would fall within the normal activities of the Customs process.
    * Where no solid object is detected and an envelope is detained only on suspicion that it may contain fraudulent documents, Customs should pass the mail to Immigration unopened. Immigration could then obtain a warrant to open it if it had reasonable grounds to do so.

    The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration rejected the recommendations, citing the apparent difficulty of detecting some solid objects like laminated cards in envelopes, and the great volume of mail passing through a postal facility. Essentially, she argued that implementing the recommendations would demand greatly increased resources.

    Since I could not reach a consensus with the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, I turned my attention to the Minister responsible for the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. My discussions with the Minister of National Revenue produced a resolution to this matter. Customs has modified its approach and now disregards the weight of courier-type envelopes in determining whether a mailing weighs more or less than 30 grams. Letters within such courier packages are treated as personal mail and not opened if the letters themselves are under 30 grams. I very much appreciate the National Revenue Minister's assistance in resolving this matter."

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    in the woods
    Posts
    1,610

    Re: Shipping guns?

    i see the weight thing has changed past few years

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    East Kootenay
    Posts
    1,364

    Re: Shipping guns?

    Thank you for the link!

    None the less, Canada Customs opening mail has nothing to do with domestic shipping of a legally purchased/owned firearm.This clearly has nothing to do with any particular carrier but is just another example of the socialist police state we are subjected to doing socialist police state shit, which is to be expected. This does not prove that alternative parcel carriers will mess with a packaged long gun.

    Nothing here has changed my mind about canada post being pure trash and the worst shipping option possible. Then again, apparently they are the cheapest too so perhaps it's just another case of getting what one pays for.
    Last edited by "No Choke"Lord Walsingham; 01-01-2017 at 12:25 PM.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Manitoba
    Posts
    561

    Re: Shipping guns?

    I have sent and received, well received dozens and dozens of firearms via Canada post with no issues whatsoever. Sent a few Too. LOL

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    709

    Re: Shipping guns?

    I just mailed it well packed and wrapped and it arrived on Friday, no issues.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    833

    Re: Shipping guns?

    I was being hassled today by the counter lady at the post office. Never had an issue before, what i do is wrap in bubble tape, then wrap in my heavy cardboard making my own 'box' and then cocoon in packing tape. She seemed to think it had to be in a locking container but I've had lot's of guns shipped to me in the original box with "remington" on the side and the only gun ever to be shipped in a hard case was a Marstar SKS that came with a free case. Perhaps that's why they give away the free case?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •