my outlook has changed what do you think?

[Fisher-Dude]

Re read my post not ignoring big issues

Yes hunter opurtunity comes first before wildlife with you it’s very clear. Also continue to ignore that many are on the same page with big issues but because they don’t support max opurtunity you ignore the fact the big picture is clear all

You have made the choice on your path so continue on part I agree on part I never will so your not worth debating with

Feel free to use the ignore button then.

Or simply stop replying to every post I make on this subject.

You have the power in your hands.

[Jelvis]

Classing different animules into a big group togedder won't work we tried that b4. Every region also has drastic differences with habitat and it's own species.
-- A six point bull elk up in Cranbrook area -- up the Bull River
-- a mule deer doe in Merrit
-- Blacktail deer near Chilly Wack
-- Goats up zee mountanes
- Sheep - Dall, Cali's, thin, thick, Moby Dick
bear, blacks n grizz whaaaaaaaaaa?
and so on - moose, goose n deer have an ice-cold beer. Every region is made that way because of natural barriers and climate change.
Jel -- each animal and region has it's own unique problems. There iz no answer, it's up to each person who hunts to be honest and stick to the regs.

[Petros65]

!00% correct !

How about we manage by science instead of emotion?

Science says wildlife herds are strongest when there is harvest across all age and sex classes. It's foolproof, has been studied to death across North America, and it works.

Emotion says let's throw some shit against the wall and see if something sticks.

Harvest of male only components of a population is the absolute worst thing we could possibly do.

Politicians love guys like you - it's cheap to screw with seasons, even though seasons won't affect wildlife numbers. Habitat and predator control will help populations, but those cost money, and politicians hate that.