All of the objectives look like good long term goals, except 1. The current resolution should not be supported, no resolution is better than a bad resolution!
All of the objectives look like good long term goals, except 1. The current resolution should not be supported, no resolution is better than a bad resolution!
https://oceola.ca/
http://bcwf.net/index.php
http://www.wildsheepsociety.net/
I Give my Heart to my Family....
My Mind to my Work.......
But My Soul Belongs to the Mountains.....
Fair enough. I realize there are both good and bad populations however, that complicates my point even more. Are we to ask for higher percentages in some regions, while others are to remain at 40%? This can be said of all species under allocation. More of a rhetorical question than being directed at you specifically.
The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.
I dont understand how any of you after all the time and effort we all have put into fighting this are ok with 40% of the sheep? Resident hunters should be getting 90% of all game animals! No more of this 40% bullshit & pandering to the guides. If we are on LEH than no tags for guides. When did we all agree to give up ?????
I agree with Spy. Too much effort has gone into this since Thomson sprung that horse crap on us. No resolution is better than that!
I agree also. I'll never be OK with a 40% split of any of our large game species. that is nothing more than privatization of a resource that belongs to the public. 90-10 or no resolution.
the resident priority program is aiming at 90/10 and 75/25. the guides will get no increase till these number are attained....fowl
"Hunting For HEALTH Not TROPHIES"
As in, guides will never have an interest in growing more wildlife if, for the most part, their numbers are guaranteed forever......
The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.