Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 104

Thread: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    191

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    All of the objectives look like good long term goals, except 1. The current resolution should not be supported, no resolution is better than a bad resolution!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Yucatan Mexico
    Posts
    14,914

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    Quote Originally Posted by Whonnock Boy View Post
    What if wildlife populations are already at carrying capacity? How can it increase if habitat will not support greater populations? Do we want more grizzlies in the Kootenay's? Sheep are already at historic levels in most regions. How will we ever get more than 60% if this is the case?

    Is the "current resolution" the 90/10 - 75/25 "marching orders"?

    If our current government agrees to all of these terms, can we trust that they will follow through? Not me....
    There are a lot of areas where sheep are not doing well at all. Ashnola(Crater may be closed in the near future), Fraser(Churn Creek), East Kootenays and the southern range of the East Slope in the Peace. All of these areas are well below historic levels.
    https://oceola.ca/
    http://bcwf.net/index.php
    http://www.wildsheepsociety.net/

    I Give my Heart to my Family....
    My Mind to my Work.......
    But My Soul Belongs to the Mountains.....

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,494

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    Fair enough. I realize there are both good and bad populations however, that complicates my point even more. Are we to ask for higher percentages in some regions, while others are to remain at 40%? This can be said of all species under allocation. More of a rhetorical question than being directed at you specifically.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone Sheep Steve View Post
    There are a lot of areas where sheep are not doing well at all. Ashnola(Crater may be closed in the near future), Fraser(Churn Creek), East Kootenays and the southern range of the East Slope in the Peace. All of these areas are well below historic levels.
    The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    14,217

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    I dont understand how any of you after all the time and effort we all have put into fighting this are ok with 40% of the sheep? Resident hunters should be getting 90% of all game animals! No more of this 40% bullshit & pandering to the guides. If we are on LEH than no tags for guides. When did we all agree to give up ?????

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    191

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    I agree with Spy. Too much effort has gone into this since Thomson sprung that horse crap on us. No resolution is better than that!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    275

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    I agree also. I'll never be OK with a 40% split of any of our large game species. that is nothing more than privatization of a resource that belongs to the public. 90-10 or no resolution.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    942

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    the resident priority program is aiming at 90/10 and 75/25. the guides will get no increase till these number are attained....fowl
    "Hunting For HEALTH Not TROPHIES"

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,494

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    What happens if game populations decrease after they have increased?

    Quote Originally Posted by fowl language View Post
    the resident priority program is aiming at 90/10 and 75/25. the guides will get no increase till these number are attained....fowl
    The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,494

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    As in, guides will never have an interest in growing more wildlife if, for the most part, their numbers are guaranteed forever......
    The measure of a man is not how much power he has, it's how he wields it.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    4-06
    Posts
    633

    Re: What is the offical BCWF allocation policy

    [QUOTE=Ohwildwon;1640647]
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dawg View Post
    In a nutshell, this is whats being considered as an approach.

    What we have now is not working, and the Government is not listening.

    LEH IS going online next year- licensing too.

    The BCWF IS moving forward with Resident Priority (a dedicated program with employees)- this is going to take a bit to get running properly but it IS a huge step for us.

    These are the directions we are pushing to the Government

    Wildlife is funded and managed consistent with the intent ofNAWCM
    • Wildlife populations managed for abundance consistent withhabitat capability
    • Resident hunter priority is attained
    • Move to change supporting legislation/policy/procedure
    • As wildlife populations increase allocated share for residenthunters increase
    • Support current resolution
    • Retiring small territories in areas of high resident use
    • Increase minimum territory size
    • Funding model is created by 2018
    • Wildlife population recovery in areas where a >30%reduction in harvest/pop estimate in last 30 years by 2025
    • As wildlife populations increase, resident proportionincreases
    Retiring/amalgamating current territories



    We realize we are not going to make everyone happy with this approach, but it's moving forward for the betterment of wildlife.[


    Very interesting!

    Perhaps posting this in Open Chat? Get more dialogue/feedback?
    What is the current resolution they want us to support?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •