Bang on, hit the nail on the head, plain old jealousy in many cases?
Printable View
I reached out to my friends in wildlife and gov on ur above comment that "the rest of the proceeds go directly to First Nations". That is not factual....not even close. Quite frankly it is a personal and fabricated statement on ur behalf. Why would you even say that. Why would you make statements about FN receiving direct compensation and the telling folks to Google it rather than giving evidence and factual data? I am horribly confused.
Those that run the show can not support what you have stated.
So why?
Well Now isn't that a turn of THOUGHT ? Hmm ! RJ
http://huntingreport.redpointresolut...tish-columbia/
There's a name mentioned in there that doesn't surprise me...
And for the record, I am in no way against these tags. A win win for conservation and for the First Nations. Good projects that help both the wildlife and the people that live off those wildlife. Again my point was to show the glaring hypocrisy that some on this board are living in. It is okay for a rich white guy to hunt in a National Park for a cranker because the end justifies the means but it is not alright for a local First Nation to hunt their traditional territory because it is a National Park? It is alright for a white resident trophy hunter to kill a 190 ram but gawd forbid if a First Nation member shoots anything but a ewe or banana curl, even though a mature ram is the better choice.
Talking to yourself again, carry on